Mitsubishi challenges vires of Sec. 254(2A) amendment restricting ITAT's stay extension powers

Mar 21,2014

Delhi HC to hear Mitsubishi Corporation’s writ challenging constitutional validity of amendment to third proviso to Sec 254(2A); Grants stay of demand in interregnum; Third proviso to Sec. 254(2A) was amended vide Finance Act, 2008 to provide that ITAT cannot extend stay of demand beyond 365 days, even if delay in appeal disposal is not attributable to assessee


Purchase this Article

2000₹   Buy Now

For 2000₹, purchase this and receive immediate online access.


Already a Subscriber?

Log in for complete access.

Log In


Contact Vidyadhar Mhatre at +91 93200 54016
Email -